Tuesday 8 May 2018

Highway to Hell - South Melbourne 0 Green Gully 3

Someone at last Sunday's game compared the season so far to a car crash, which I thought was an incredibly morbid idea.

It's also an incredibly wrong one. After all, the car hasn't crashed yet. All that's happened is that someone's kicked the driver out of the car, taken his keys, and started careening down the freeway weaving in and out of traffic. Now it's starting to get wet, which means the tyres on the car haven't had time to adjust to the newfound slickness of the road. Oh, and as we're getting closer to winter, daylight is getting in shorter supply, and because we play home games which finish up close to dusk, visibility is becoming an issue. But we haven't decided yet to drive on the wrong side of the road and climbing over the median strip, and we're still some way (and a willing partner) short of initiating a drag race which will see us plunge off Dead Man's Curve into the ravine below culminating in our fiery deaths.

So, to say that this is a car crash of a season is wrong. It's a car crash waiting to happen, and we're doing our best to make it happen, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't enjoy the ride - wherever it ends up.

The reasonable question that has been asked is with Milos Lujic suspended and soon to go on holidays, and Leigh Minopoulos and Giordano Marafioti injured, where are the goals going to come from until such time as we can get a striker in during the transfer window? The same people ask - perhaps genuinely, perhaps mischievously - why doesn't the club just use the next available 20s striker? It's almost comically ironic that the player in question just happens to be the progeny of the director of which so much potentially libellous innuendo has been spread. Even funnier that on Sunday in the 20s game, that the player scored a couple of goals.

But as it was, we continued to rely on the three pronged attack of Oliver Minatel, Andy Brennan, and Matthew Millar. OK, we know Minatel isn't a forward, and we know that cruel as it may sound, everyone at the ground has given up on Millar scoring goals - though we'll be overjoyed for him and for the club if he does. But Brennan is a different prospect. For whatever reason, he hasn't been able to put it together this season. There's fitness issues to be sure. But clearly there's also mental stuff. How else to explain the four or so clear-cut, harder-to-miss-than-score chances that he wasted in the first half?

Rather than going in to half time a solid and very fair three goals up, we went into halftime at 0-0, and the signs and premonitions were ominous. We'd likely have a couple of good chances early in the second half, probably fail to take them, than concede some stupid goal which consign us to defeat. And that's exactly what happened. Those first half misses by Millar and Brennan kept Gully in the game, a game we weren't playing particularly well in, but which we were nevertheless doing better than our higher ranked opposition.

Having failed to take our chances, the eventual mistake came in the form of a careless penalty. Jake Marshall fouled his opponent in a part of the 18 yard box and in such a situation where it didn't seem like there would be much danger or need to tackle his opponent. But he did, Gully scored the penalty, and though we persisted in trying to get back into the game, the game was done. The second and third goals conceded were icing on the cake, one of them infuriating and demoralising in equal measure because the low cross to the unmarked player at the back post was so simple, and yet something that we ourselves have botched time and time again.

Of course it got worse than the final 3-0 scoreline. Brad Norton got a yellow card for being injured in a tackle by an opponent; well, I don't see what else it could've been for. Oh, and coach Sasa Kolman got himself sent into the stands for the second time this season. At least in that he's been able to match one of the feats of his predecessor, who was sent to the stands twice in 2016. Prior to his dismissal Kolman could be seen desperately trying to motivate our players, probably trying to remind them to pick up their energy levels and to "pass and move" as per what I saw at their Wednesday training session before the senior women's cup game.

The greatest proof of our hopelessness was a corner we received in the second half. First of all, it clearly wasn't a corner; the ball probably didn't even reach the byline. Then we took it short, which never works for us, but here it almost did, except that despite executing it as best as we have for a long time, it still didn't work. And thus we're in the early 2013 phase, where we're going to comfort ourselves with the Gus Tsolakis mantra of that era "that one of these weeks we're going to absolutely batter a team".

It was little comfort then, and less comfort now, but there's still a transfer window coming up, and time to turn things around. But that's just my view, that of the perennial optimist.

New things
Another week, and more novel things to distract us from whats happening on the field. First up, it looks like there's new people in the kitchen. I'm giving them time to get themselves in order, but I reckon avoid the spanakopita, which lacks any semblance of salt or saltiness, which is absolutely essential to a good spanakopita. Anyone doubting my credentials on these matters, I'm happy to relay them in excruciating detail at a game near you.

Strangely, one beer in the social not available on tap was Carlton Draught, but I'm sure that'll get rectified. There was also no ice cream truck, but there was a loukoumades truck, which sadly because it took so damn long to set up I was not able to make use of.

In the stand there were new people, which rather than something we as South fans will celebrate we will find a way to be suspicious of. Not without good reason, mind you. These were young guys, dressed in casual gear, Melbourne City supporters invited over by the remnants of the Enosi group. Described like that, is it any wonder people were having flashbacks to when the Victory affiliated kids hung around and then caused all sorts of shit?

I don't want to tar these guys with the same brush, and on Sunday they livened the atmosphere a bit - even their rendition of the "schizophrenia" mosh was too rigorous for security - without causing any problems. But their mates who've invited them should make sure to remind them of a few things. First, no flares. Second, to ditch the casual "clobber". Third, that Clarendon Corner is casual in only one sense, in that it is incredibly slack about chanting, banners, organisation, and sometimes even paying attention to the game.

So to the boys who joined us last week and may or may not choose to continue coming to South games, remember that the goal is to take the game seriously, but not take ourselves seriously. Or something. One of the Clarendon Corner's elder statesmen relayed to me his wife's thoughts on what CC is: basically the soccer equivalent of the Lost Dogs Home. In other words, a bunch of scruffy, sad, yappy individuals who aren't looking for any trouble.

Next game
Kingston away on Monday night.

Rescheduling of abandoned Heidelberg fixture
The round 9 match - which was abandoned due to Heidelberg player Harry Noon's corner flag induced injury - will be replayed in full on Sunday August 19th.

Taylor to Oakleigh, at last
After apparently helping out at Green Gully for a bit, Chris Taylor has ended up at Oakleigh as their new coach. Gus Tsolakis must be sick of losing his job to CT by now. Taylor's been joined by his assistant Chris Marshall, and the third part of that former South coaching contingent, goalkeeping coach Bojo Jevdevic.

These things happen. *shrugs shoulders*

But just like the last time Taylor got a job at Tsolakis' expense, there's rumours of movement at the station, this time at our fine establishment, with three or four of players apparently looking to move across to Oakleigh. Some people are also claiming that there could be some players heading the other way if this happens, which makes the upcoming transfer window even more important than it already was.

Still, if this happens, I'm looking forward to how all this is handled given that we have players under contract, and indeed went to great lengths to get all our players (or at the least those considered worthwhile) under contract before we ditched Taylor.

Anyway, back to Oakleigh for a minute. Given that our results this season have been much closer to ratshit than glorious, it's probably not worth taking the time to take the piss out of Oakleigh's current predicament. Besides which, they're two from two under Taylor, so compared to us they're flying. Still, when they post stuff like this:
Even a non-betting man like myself is thinking about putting a cheeky tenner on Oakleigh finishing as runner up, bridesmaid finishes being that club's speciality.

Scent of blood
The other week came the revelation that South Melbourne was one of a number A-League aspirants which had approached Wellington Phoenix to buy out the Phoenix's A-League licence. From our end, it seems that about a year ago the club had negotiated with Phoenix for purchasing a 25% stake, providing women's and youth teams, and playing some games in Melbourne. The two parties however failed to proceed further than those early discussions, and the matter came to an end.

Following that news however, there has been a renewal of interest in the current state of the Phoenix licence, and to a lesser degree South Melbourne's designs to acquire it. That renewal of general interest in Wellington's ultimate fate as an A-League location is tied to longer term issues: should there be an New Zealand team in Australian soccer? What will the A-League look like when its make up is finally "complete"? What will even be the structure of Australian soccer as a whole once the necessary FIFA reforms are applied?

For Wellington's part, none of this is being helped by delayed and then unconvincing denials by their owners that their licence is for sale. And even if one were to believe them, remember this: in August 2013, Melbourne Heart's then Director of Football, John Didulica, claimed on radio that Heart were not for sale; just a few months later, Melbourne Heart were bought out by the City group.

Another article in The Age on the Wellington matter this week noted that South was again seeking to talk to Phoenix about a deal. This was followed up by a piece on The World Game (ostensibly about Brisbane Strikers' interest in buying Phoenix), which included some information on the nature of the negotiations between ourselves and Phoenix. This includes the fact that Wellington originally approached South to try and offload 25% of its licence for $1.5 million, with board member and head of the South Melbourne for A-League bid team Bill Papastergiadis noting that:
"The enticement for us was to play the youth league and women’s league in Melbourne full-time with our colours, but still having some form of the Wellington brand."
More broadly however, there remains an infuriating vagueness about even elementary details of what a South Melbourne team in the A-League would look like. For example, while Papastergiadis said this in the The Age article:
"South Melbourne and our blue strip is our name, our history and our brand, and that's what we are going to be wherever we play."
It's not much different to what was said a couple of years ago when we kicked off this latest attempt at getting into the A-League. Still, when Papastergiadis says:
"we have not only past examples of record crowds but also recent evidence from our FFA semi-final against Sydney which rated 56,000 on Fox Football"
it's reassuring that Michael Lynch pushes back even just a bit on these kinds of claims by noting:
Whether fans tuned in to watch South or the A-League champions that night is a matter for debate
Of course in the grand scheme of things, it's still a far cry from the rigorous examination that every Australian soccer journalist should be applying to every A-League bid. But it's a start.

What we can say with some certainty as outside observers is that the market rate for the Phoenix licence seems to be $6 million, which is well below the over $10 million recently paid for the Adelaide United franchise by mystery overseas investors. Less certain is how any team seeking to buy out the Phoenix outright would get around the issue of the apparent geographical clauses in the Phoenix licence which ties that licence to New Zealand, though one can easily posit that that if FFA were amenable to it, that they could change the rules pretty easily.

Less certain, also, is whether Wellington's owners want to sell their team outright, or work on a finding a partnership solution. There's also no clarity on whether a team taking out the Wellington licence and transferring it to Australia would be guaranteed the Phoenix's share of the television rights; this is important, because talk is that the two expansion sides for A-League season 2019/20 will have to survive - at least in the short term - without such funding.

Further uncertainty was caused by Wellington Phoenix eventually issuing a passionate/ranting press release, more or less accusing a lot of people of lying, and of wanting to feed on the not-quite-yet existent Phoenix corpse. Which, to be fair, is their right to do so, I suppose, but I will say this: days of silence, followed by mealy-mouthed media mumblings, followed by backs-to-the-wall bravado a whole week after all this started, is hardly a clever PR game. Not that any of that matters, of course.

Winning and losing, in that order
Last Wednesday night the senior women strutted their stuff in the TeamApp Cup against Bulleen. They'd beaten Bulleen at Lakeside in the league the previous Saturday, and fielded a strong side in this one. Maybe too strong, as we'll soon see. There was also a members/dine with the players night, though I think only a handful of the saddest cases turned up for that; otherwise, the crowd was mostly made up of members of the junior girls teams, and their parents.

There were no corner flags on kickoff, but the game progressed anyway, and you kinda wondered why we bother with them. If we need to have a corner marker, might we better off switching to rugby league style short padded posts? Anyway, eventually some corner flags turned up, and no one thought about corner flags again for the rest of the evening, and hopefully ever again.

There was no Lisa De Vanna - she sat on the bench - but we didn't need her. We were the dominant team, and cruised to a 3-0 victory and into the next round against Greater Geelong Galaxy. Except that we didn't! We played an ineligble player - probably someone that was already cup tied - and had the result reversed. For a tournament that we didn't apparently care that much about, we sure when tout of oru way to do well and then completely botch it.

As disappointing as it was for all who were genuinely concerned by this shambles of bookkeeping practice, it was bizarre that some people who don't even care about women's soccer, nay, are just as likely to be actively hostile to women's soccer, saw this as an opportunity to feign indignation about the forfeit. Probably no accident that there's some crossover in that demographic of people who are caning the board for Chris Taylor's sacking when they spent the last few years wanting Taylor sacked.

More genuinely disappointing is the news that women's coach Socrates Nicolaides will be resigning from his post and heading back to the United States for family reasons. Soc was not only successful, but he also seemed to really care about the welfare of the players under his command, and seemed like one of the better people at the club. Oh well, an opportunity for someone else to carry on his good work.

Launch of Andrew Howe's Socceroos encyclopaedia 
Australian soccer statistician and historian Andrew Howe will soon be travelling around the country to launch his new Socceroos encyclopaedia. The venue for his Melbourne event? Our very own South Melbourne Hellas social club. The launch will be on Tuesday May 29th, from 5:30-7:00, and you can register here to attend.

Don't forget also that the PFA history conference is on Tuesday May 15th, also in the social club.

Around the grounds
Mucho delusions of grandeur
Last Saturday I ventured, alone, by car(!), to Scovell Reserve in Maidstone for Maidstone United vs Kensington City. Parts of the Liberal Party are debating bringing back corporal punishment for crimes; I reckon they could save themselves a lot of money and a lot of time battling civil rights lawyers in court by revising their plan and making them watch State League 5 - extra punishment is to stand behind the goals and focus on the goalkeeping. Three times from set pieces Maidstone dumped the ball into the six yard box, and the Kensington keeper just watched it get cleaned up by an opponent for a goal. Then there's the players who take the ball from their own teammates. Best of all was when the visitors had a free kick, and all of a sudden there was much frantic yelling of instructors from the bench and the few supporters present like they were audience members of a Spanish language Price is Right. Here's where it gets really stupid though: I was informed afterwards that some of the Kensington people thought I was a spy, because I was by myself and on my phone a lot. Now, in the unlikely event those boys are reading this post, I'm going to lay it out very clearly:
  1. I was on my phone doing occasional Twitter updates, and keeping tabs on footy scores.
  2. You're going to have to play much better than you do right now to be worth spying on.
Oh, Maidstone won the game 5-2, in a canter.

Final thought
Think of it this way: if Sasa Kolman's South Melbourne coaching stint ends badly, based on Oakleigh's recent coach hiring history, Kolman's still at worst a 50/50 chance of eventually getting the gig at Oakleigh.

32 comments:

  1. Well done on the statement to do with the new lads in the CC, Paul. Their behaviour was fine on Sunday and I have no issue with their moshing or whatever it is, but ditching the clobber would be good just for pre determined ideas of them. Was good to see Enosi back on the terraces however, where have they been?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Apologies for not approving this comment earlier, I thought I had done so.

      Delete
  2. Paul, I think reality is setting in. We create the illusion we are a big club but in the cold hard light of day we are ordinary both on and off the pitch. Compare our bid to Team11. Blows us out of the water. Our only chance is pro / rel to get back to where we would like to, not necessarily where we belong. Look at the media hype Team11 have generated it made it clear we have nothing new to offer. Just re-hashed demands to be in the top flight because based on emotion not fact. Let's rule the roost first in the NPL and pray for a national second division. Regards, Eoka

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The South-East Melbourne bid is lacking $ but they are putting out the rod and line and fishing for backers. I think they have been transparent from that front. I am not an SM member but I do attend 5-6 matches per season. What I want to know though Paul if possible have Hellas disclosed who the mysterious Chinese backers are to the members? Have they asked our membership base if they are supportive of this ? What I am trying to determine is I wouldve thought they obtain permission from the members in order to put forward an A-League bid and have members understand what it means for the club. Everyone it seems is avoiding the point that if granted entry we would have to hand over the South Melbourne IP to the FFA as part of the license. As in we would need to sell our soul to the devil, so we seem to be OK with that, but not OK with the #McFranchise #FranksALeague #tournamentcartel. Honestly are we schizophrenic ? Everything about us is contradictory (including our identity).

      Delete
    2. There's a number of points to discuss here, all worthwhile.

      One aspect of the bitter vs new dawn discussions that has annoyed me for several years is the "club vs franchise" debate which conflates several different arguments. Because the "McFranchise" label has been thrown around as an emotive tool, it obscures the technical/legal/logistical elements of a potential South Melbourne entry into the A-League.

      As you've pointed out, "franchise" in a legal/business sense means something very different to the history/authenticity debates. Would most South supporters (whether they are comfortable with being a "franchise" or not) realise that every AFL club is also a franchise, and has its IP owned by the AFL? Those are the kinds of discussions we should be having, instead of going off half cocked talking about questions of Australian soccer history which have been otherwise settled. Well, settled in the way I see them I suppose.

      On the matter of the mystery Chinese backers... if they exists, your guess as to their identity and motivations are as good as mine. If they were real, it would be nice if we were told about them, especially when there have been some very good opportunities to do so, not least the most recent AGM and the Guangzhou R&F visit.

      As for whether the club has gained the approval the members for their support... there are different ways of answering this I guess. The first is that the club has had the aim of returning to the top flight since its omission/absence, and successive committees have sought to do this in various ways.

      Though this is purely anecdotal, previously I would've said that for most of our members, there would be have been broad support for these efforts. Different supporters would have had different non-negotiable parameters - name, colours, ownership, venue, control of IP, etc - but broadly would have been in agreement with the general aim of getting into the A-League.

      Now that the A-League is in a phase where its treading water a little bit, where it hasn't got the TV deal it thought it would, and where there appears to be no guarantee of TV money for the new entrants at least for a few seasons, there's probably more hesitation among our members.

      Add to that the FFA Congress and independent A-League movements, and the appearance of a much more organised movement for a second division and/or promotion and relegation, and I think our supporters are if not quite hedging their bets, then at least becoming more cautious about whether getting into the A-League at any cost is worth the price of what "may" be lost, or the risks the club would take to do so.

      So, while I think there is still support among our members for South getting back into the top-flight, I think the way our supporters approach this question has changed and become more nuanced and fractured. If I'm right that that's the case, then I don't think the board is in synch with its membership on this issue.

      Now boards are appointed (or in South's case, out of necessity self-selected) to run the day-to-day and long term affairs of the club on behalf of the membership, and most of the time its inappropriate to canvas the members on every single issue that comes up. But on this matter, it may well be worthwhile to have a supporters meeting outside of an AGM to canvas the mood of the members, to see if there is broad support for what it is the board is currently trying to achieve with regards to this issue. And if there isn't, the board should know this, because many of us are still going under the assumption that ultimately the members will have to approve whatever it is the board come up with if at any point they do get in principle approval from FFA to join the A-League whatever the process for that is.

      Delete
    3. Having said that, even if it's entirely possible that the club knows it's very little chance of getting an A-League licence this time around, there's a solid argument that there's good reconnaissance to be made from participating in the process and getting access to all sorts of information that the club would otherwise be unable to get. But that's a bit of different issue.

      Delete
    4. Your comment was nearly worthy of a stand alone blog post. Very good. We are now very close to the time when the bidders will be announced. Might be time to have an "Eye on Expansion" style fortnightly blog update. :)

      Insofar as to members being asked to vote on an A League bid, has anything similar happened to South Melbourne Hellas in the past? Personally, I suspect this will be a very tough decision for me, (and for many others).

      Delete
    5. In the post-NSL era, there was a vote at an AGM circa 2009 to approve the Lakeside memorandum of understanding between the government and ourselves, allowing the club to proceed with the fuller negotiations. Apart from that, the only other things I can remember where we had a vote in this era was to change the name of the controlling company from "South Melbourne Hellas Soccer Club" to "South Melbourne Hellas". There was also a vote to change the club's constitution as part of the Crawford/FFV reforms broadening the club's voting franchise.

      In the late NSL era, which was before my time as a member of the club, there were votes I believe on approving a new logo after the club discarded the Lakers logo, and most significantly, a vote on approving the move to go full time professional.

      Delete
    6. That move to 'professionalism' was after I left, but I couldn't see any benefit whilst the stench of the NSL lingered. A bit of hubris too.

      Delete
  3. Its for the best we are only getting a few hundred at our games now. We are on a huge decline both on and off the field. Turning up to lakeside is not a fun experience anymore, i daresay things were better before we even had the social club as the atmosphere in that place is depressing.

    As for the game it went to script, no forwards of any note means that our chances fall to the usual suspects and its the same result week after week. More alarmingly none of our midfielders are capable of scoring. You look at the good teams in this league and they have half a dozen guys on the field that can score. At this point relegation looks more likely then finals. One of our biggest ever transfer windows coming up.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Lujic sitting with Chris Marshall on the weekend is not a good sign for us. Still the only guy who can put the ball in the back of the net. Rumour is Millar, Epifano and Lujic are set to join Oakleigh next season. Club is official screwed if this happens!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lots of rumours flying about on those fronts, but no point in getting prematurely agitated I reckon. Plenty of time to freak out at the appropriate moment.

      Delete
    2. I thought that initially too, however, Milos is very good friends with CM... they tag each other in memes on Facebook, so it may not nearly be as sinister as it may appear. Just mates catching up.

      Delete
    3. Kimon Trimboli9 May 2018 at 11:58

      Something is clearly very wrong at Lakeside.
      Having a poor season every so often is not that much of a big deal but the last 2-3 years of trying to re-invent ourselves and push for inclusion into the plastic paradise seems to have been a step too far.
      Just like the Knights last year, every other little village team in the NPL is openly wishing for us to get relegated this year. I can imagine the celebrations in Oakleigh, Bentleigh, Northcote now... I think the only ones who will truly miss us are the Bergers and the Knights as it somewhat cushions the blow of having to compete in this carnival of league when they at least have a decent rival to play against....

      I had to sit there in silence on Sunday listening to two fat Maltese bitches laugh at the "sack the board" chants ... the shame....

      Delete
    4. All those clubs you mentioned would feel the pinch if we got relegated..the biggest crowd they get for the season comes against South. I dont see how a relegated South benefits anyone.

      Delete
    5. Kimon Trimboli9 May 2018 at 15:20

      Maybe they relish the chance to be the big fish in the little NPL pond for a change? Who knows, but my spies tell me that there where quite a few frape glasses being clinked together in "cheers" to Green Gully in Eaton mall on Monday ... Apparently a few of the more "robust" local identities wanted to put a lamb on the spit in the middle of the shopping area when we lost to Hume for the FFA cup a few months ago... maybe things will change when the bouzouki owner signs on to be co-(assistant?)coach soon?

      Delete
    6. Spoke to CM too at the bar seems like he a mates with Luijc, told me Kolman a really good coach and our luck will turn and that he was there supporting his mates. Top bloke really friendly and worked for south four years for free which is good value

      Delete
  5. I should note - and I'm not sure why I didn't include this in this week's blog - that I also had a very quick chat with Chris Marshall at the game. We mostly talked about the obvious - that South should've buried their chances in the first half - and about Kolman's ejection. Marshall brought up the concern that as it was Kolman's second ejection within a season, that it could be brought up at the tribunal, and cost the club three points.

    It's a line of thought that was also brought up by some South people as well. Marshall thought of it because both he and Taylor were dismissed from the bench at different points in 2016, and there was concern back then that such a penalty could be applied, as the rule (apparently) applies to any staff dismissed from the bench, not just one person being done in twice.

    Where we differed - and it's great that Gains wrote that summary of red cards and dismissals that year - is whether Taylor had been sent to the stands twice in one year (Marshall said no, I'd said yes).

    Now of course rules and their application can change, but nevertheless, Kolman's got to control himself a bit. Not sure how often he was dismissed from the benches during his under 20s stint.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Marshall correct in one part, sorry Gains. Taylor was not officially sent to the stands against Hume and included in no referees report from what i understand, this appears true as he missed no further games from the bench the only one being Altona Magic in the cup where Marshall stepped in for him following Taylor being sent to the stands against Oakleigh. Against Hume he went to calm down Markovski who was targeting Tim Mala with some verbal abuse.

      However the rules on a double sending off for the same club associate have changed and a points deduction is no longer a penalty. It is only if the federation decide to charge the club with "failing to control a club associate" that a 3 point deduction is a possibility.

      This seems unlikely as Kolman's actions surely wouldnt constitute a serious incident or misdemeanor.

      Kolman will be given 2 games ban and double the fine from his previous dismissal. The least he deserves for acting like a teenager.

      Keep up the good work Paul - always enjoy the Blog !

      Delete
    2. Thanks for the excellent clarification, appreciate it.

      Delete
    3. Kolman received one week ban.

      Delete
  6. And another thing, Jerrad Tyson's control of the ball at his feet and his extra touches throughout the game were more than a bit disconcerting. Here's hoping that was a one-off.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Could be just a bit of rust with Jarrad hasnt played much.

      Also realised how bumpy the lakeside playing surface is these days, i remember it being carpet like 2012-2016.

      Do we even have one aspect of the club that hasnt significantly declined?


      Delete
  7. Just on Minatel, i thought it was his best game so far. He won every ball in the air and his accurate passing stood out.
    Seemed to be less in the game after hurting his back late in the first half.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He was playing as a 9 on the weekend and did not have one chance on goal? That is not a good game for me. Its Great to see pretty touches on the half way line and nice passes but so many balls fell into the box and he was not in his position to score. Lujic or Minops would of probably ended up with 3 on the weekend had they played.

      Delete
  8. Strong rumour that epifano is on his way to heidelberg

    ReplyDelete
  9. What was the commotion as the players left the field after the game?

    I noticed some fans appearing to get agitated.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Probably more agitation towards the referee rather than anything else.

      Delete
    2. Some of the Enosi boys were getting very agitated at the referee as he walked off, a couple were getting held back by their mates

      Delete
  10. Do South have a visa spot available? Surely this would be used on a forward to fill the Lujic void, how long is he going away for?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Five week suspension plus a trip to Russia for the World Cup.

      Delete
  11. Friday afternoon to release match highlights against Gully? Simply not good enough. Just another example of the decline of the club.

    ReplyDelete

A few notes on comments.

We've had a lot of fun over the years with my freewheeling comments policy, but all good things must come to an end. Therefore I will no longer be approving comments that contain personal abuse of any sort.

Still, if your post doesn't get approved straight away, it's probably because I haven't seen it yet.

As usual, publication of a comment does not mean endorsement of its content.